Desmond Tutu, Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, has died aged 90.  A Nobel Peace Prize winner in 1984, never an ANC member and in later years not even an ANC voter, he was much despaired by post-Apartheid South Africa’s violence and political corruption.  But he was an idealist, not a realist.  The term “rainbow nation” was his invention.  He evidently expected his country to develop into some world-exemplar of Christian tolerance and racial justice.

So here is the question which Desmond Tutu could not confront.  One might call it the African Question. It’s a bit long!

As enslaving another people ... any people ... is manifestly wrong, and segregation by law is not tolerated by liberals because its practise inevitably leaves the Africans holding the shitty and humiliating end of the socio-economic stick (and by Jews because it doesn’t produce the deracinated, amorphous gentile of the End Time), and if the only permitted basis on which society may be constructed is panmixia and equality in all things while, at the same time, living with the African sociobiology is simply not tolerable for other races, including Europeans, then how but by complete separation is any people to live a fitting and properly satisfying life?

Unfortunately, Europeans in southern Africa (and in America too) wanted the whole land. The Dutch-Flemish wanted to settle the land while the British wanted control of its economic resources - to which end the Raj model couldn’t be made to work owing to the nature of African tribal life.  The military incapacity of Africans likewise invited a full colonisation approach, and the forcing of them into an effective slave-labour status.  It is easy say with hindsight that this was a short-sighted policy led by ambition and greed, which were just the standards of the time.  But such it was and, inevitably, that required the adoption of sub-optimal control measures which, much later, could not indefinitely withstand the pressure from reformists within and grandstanding political elites without. 

Still, it was never a European land.  Africa is not a European continent.  Today, we hold this to be true of our continent, which is for us natives and our children alone, so we must be consistent and say the same of every other native people.  Only total separation on the land can deliver a sustaining settlement.

As for Bishop Desmond, he did right by his people, which we, as nationalists, cannot criticise.

Incredible last-lap drama in the last race of the F1 season in Abu Dhabi.  Mercedes pay for not giving up track position to bolt on fresh rubber.  We have a new F1 world champion, though one expects that Mercedes, who are already disputing race director Michael Masi’s somewhat wavering interpretation of the rules, will go to law if they don’t get their way.

Here it is.  Enjoy:

Doesn’t count in my book

— TJ (@TJftbl) December 12, 2021

Just not this one ...

Yes, Barbara Broccoli thinks the culture war can be pushed to its logical conclusion:

007 ‘could be non-binary’: Britain’s most famous spy could in future be someone who considers themselves neither male or female, says Barbara Broccoli
• James Bond could identify as ‘non-binary’ in future, 007’s producer has revealed
• Barbara Broccoli poured cold water on suggestions the role could go to a woman
• But she conceded future Bond could be ‘non-binary’ and use the pronoun ‘they’

‘The name’s Bond. James Bond. Pronouns: Them/they.’

He may be an enduring symbol of masculinity, but Britain’s most famous spy could identify as ‘non-binary’ in future, 007’s producer has revealed.

Barbara Broccoli has poured cold water on suggestions the role could go to a woman… but in a new interview, she conceded a future Bond could be ‘non-binary’ – someone who considers themselves neither male or female, and usually prefers to be referred to as ‘they’ rather than ‘he’ or ‘she’.

Speaking to the Girls On Film podcast, Ms Broccoli talked about the hunt to replace Daniel Craig who is stepping down from the role after No Time To Die.

When host Anna Smith asked if she thought 007 would always be male, she replied: ‘I do, because I don’t think that we should be making films where women are playing men.

‘I think we should be making more films about women. I think Bond will be a man.’

Smith suggested ‘Non-binary, perhaps, maybe one day?’ to which Ms Broccoli replied: ‘Who knows? I mean, I think it’s open. We just have to find the right actor.’

Ms Broccoli, who controls the 007 franchise through her Eon Production company, also said the next Bond might not be white, adding: ‘We want the actor to be British… and British, as we know, can be many things.’ ...

British can also mean sane white men who will never patronise Babs’ cash-cow again.  OK, the Bond character was always a degenerate.  Black women, Chinese women, Japanese women, other men’s mystery meat wives, fortune-hunters in casinos, spy-girls with guns or bikinis or not even bikinis ...  But he was always unquestionably a man.  Apparently, that will cease to be necessary, and audiences will just accept it cuz “progress”.  It’s interesting how Babs just slots, so to speak, in with the Judaic default assumption that the gentile has no nature and can be herded into this social confection or that.  She ... they ... zee/zey, whatever ... are wrong, were always wrong.  Nature will out.

As it happens, there is a way for Eon Production to prove it.  Obviously, the franchise is wedded to ever greater techno-spectacle and ever greater postmodern lunacy.  But a nice way to honour Fleming and continue the Bond character, while keeping 007 running along the current mad lines, would have been a scaled down second series returned to the 1960s but with the grittiness and greater psychological depth of the Craig films.  A decent writer would be Russell Lake, who created the Endeavour character and who has a fine eye for period.

I would bet that the 007 spectacle would die out and the beauty of the lost world of Europe would prevail.

After Lewis Hamilton’s race activism and Seb Vettel’s homo-activism we get a mob-handed jab-activist video from the “driver community” of F1.  It is very difficult to imagine the swashbuckling greats of FI’s past like Nigel Mansell, Graham Hill, or James Hunt obediently following the corporate script.  Are men today really so much smaller in their personal stature and sense of right and wrong?  Is that what the vast wealth they can accrue today does to them?

Interestingly, the only driver who has absented himself from jab-duty is Kimi Räikkönen, who probably does belong to the individualist model of yesteryear, and who, anyway, is leaving the circus after tomorrow’s final race of the season.

According to his wiki page, Norman Fenton is “Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London and is also a director of Agena, a company that specialises in risk management for critical systems”.  Queen Mary is a research university allied to UCL.

Here Prof Fenton explains his department’s eye-opening work on all-cause mortality in regard to the claimed efficacy of the Covid vaccines.  This short LBC interview from 4th December is currently posted on YouTube, so it’s living on borrowed time.  Prof Fenton has already found that the usual journals of peer review are rejecting his papers - something he says he has never experienced before.

Speaking last Sunday, with eight other doctors at the Texas Covid Summit:

https://rumbleDOTcom/vpnz0g-texas-covid-19-summit-dr.-peter-mccullough-vaccines-treatment-and-covid-19.html